The biggest problem SL faces as a communications technology is the unappealing light it has been portrayed in in Hollywood and the resulting image "non-SLers" gain from these shows. I know first hand because I was one of them. I think a lot of people are hesitant to join worlds such as SL because they are afraid that they too will end up with a stalker or worse. There are a lot of skeptics out there, and I think that unless Linden Lab makes more effort to put SL in a more positive, less "serial-killer" type light then it will slowly begin to die out.
So please Linden Lab! Get on this! God forbid millions of successful 30 somethings lose their escape from the hectic business world! They NEED Second Life!!
May I reprint this in my blog?
ReplyDeleteWho ARE virtual worlds FOR, anyway?
I love the tone, and the post relates to an ongoing debate about private versions of SL that businesses will soon be able to host (at a starting cost of $55,000). See:
http://www.massively.com/2009/11/04/linden-lab-launches-second-life-enterprise-beta-second-life-wor/
There's some confusion about what these places "want to be" when they "grow up." The CSI episode provides a great example of marketing that backfired on a company. It could be a case-study in a Marketing 101 class.
Of course. I would be honored to be on your blog.
ReplyDeleteI have been an over-acchiever and have read a few blogs about this topic. It seems to be one of the more popular problems with SL. I even wrote about it. One of my friends even said something like "Second Life, isn't that the game that 30 somethings play in their mom's basement". It is this negative image that is crippling SL.
ReplyDelete